Find the right category
Teacher productivity, research, tutoring, assessment, feedback, creative work and more.
Start with the job you need to do, who will use the AI and what information is involved. Then compare capability, safeguarding, privacy, security and school controls.
Designed for UK school staff, leaders, DPOs, DSLs and IT teams. Results support a decision; they do not certify or approve a product.
Evidence baseline: September 2026 · Supplier terms and features can change; verify before procurement or deployment.Compare tools in context, expose evidence gaps and record what still needs checking.
The same AI tool can be reasonable for one use and inappropriate for another. The Decision Centre separates capability from assurance so staff can explore options without confusing a shortlist with approval.
Teacher productivity, research, tutoring, assessment, feedback, creative work and more.
Privacy, administration, learner safeguards and evidence depth stay visible alongside capability.
Supplier evidence supports a decision but does not replace the school's contract, DPIA or safeguarding review.
Five questions narrow the landscape. The result is a fit model, not an approval or compliance score.
Core products are assessed by purpose, audience, admin controls, privacy evidence and learner-facing safeguards.
Practical questions shaped around DfE product safety, ICO data protection expectations and NCSC security principles.
Defined educational purpose, target age, staff/pupil roles and whether the tool is genuinely needed.
Age-appropriate filtering, learner supervision, reporting, moderation and escalation routes.
Lawful basis, processor status, DPA, subprocessors, retention, deletion, transfers, transparency and DPIA triage.
MFA/SSO, least privilege, admin roles, encryption, logging, patching, incident response and AI-specific attack risks.
Overreliance, manipulation, wellbeing, cognitive development, human help and avoiding inappropriate dependency.
Approved use register, owner, staff training, acceptable use, evidence links, review date and change monitoring.
Tools move into the core matrix when there is enough school-relevant evidence to assess them responsibly.
OpsWise can review the exact tenant, DPA, data flow, safeguarding controls and intended use; document the decision; and produce a dated AI Assurance record for SLT, governors and the DPO.
Supplier statements are evidence inputs, not OpsWise certification. Contract-specific terms and school configuration can materially change the assessment.